Supremely UNjust!
  • Supreme Court Disregards U.S. Constitution
  • Supreme Court's UNconstitutional DENIAL of Noack's Petition
  • Why Does It Matter?
  • What CAN you do?
  • They SWEAR WHAT ?!?
  • Sworn Labor Complaint
  • Info. from YMCA Deposition of Mr. Noack
  • Evaluations of Mr. Noack by 3 Different Supervisors
  • Email Evidence!
  • Proven Pay Problems?
  • U.S. JUDICIAL CORRUPTION POLL
  • FLYERs - YOU can Help!
  • Possible LAWS Broken?
    Here is an interesting little poll that enthusiasts of judicial reform might like to take to quiz themselves or others on problems involving the Noack vs YMCA case and judicial corruption in general.   Poll your friends & family members on a rainy day;  or, it could be fun to use in public parks & other safe pedestrian areas, at school, college campuses, with politicians & elected govt officials, etc.   Need a school project?  Extra credit for class?  A scout project?   Hmmm!
   The questions and indications may be partially influenced by personal opinion and experiences; so, they may not be exact according to technical regulations, as they simply mesh with some person's own experiences.  Check it out!  You might alter it if you wish, but copyright on it is reserved in matters of publication.  It's okay to use copies for your polling on this issue.  Just don't sell it or publish it.  Also, maybe do a test print on it, first: make sure the pages come out right & page-numbers are correct.  If you send the link, you might help make a wildfire of good change in America!  

    If it looks nice,...Grab your clipboard!!
 
   
                                                                         U.S.  JUDICIAL  CORRUPTION  POLL

    YES       NO

  1  ___      ___    Do you think U.S. Courts are honest?      

  2  ___      ___    Are the courts’ results & outcomes FAIR (in your opinion)?

  3  ___      ___   In your own opinion, is there much intentional corruption in U.S. courts…..

                                ___  on the part of the parties involved?

                                ___  on the part of the attorneys involved?

                                ___  on the part of the judges?

  4  ___      ___    Do you think judicial outcomes are prejudiced based on…..

                                ___  race?    -- If so, is that  very little,  somewhat,  or  much?  (circle)

                                ___  gender?   -- If so, … very little,  somewhat,  or  much?  (circle)

                                ___  religion?   -- If so, … very little,  somewhat,  or  much?  (circle)

  5  ___      ___    Do you believe the decisions of judges are ever motivated by factors other than the facts?

                               If so, what other factors motivate them?

                                 ___  personal biases      ___  business or financial interests   ___  professional connections

                                 ___ other  (explain) ___________________________________________________________


                                __________________________________________________________________________

                                __________________________________________________________________________

  6  ___      ___    Do witnesses ever lie?

                               If so, do you believe they lie…..seldom,   often,  or  in between  in frequency?  (circle)      

  7 ___      ___    Do you think it really makes any difference either in the outcomes  or  to the U.S. legal system as a whole?      

  8  ___      ___    Will a witness lie in order to save a job, career, or public image?      

  9  ___      ___    Do current safeguards give workers enough protection against retaliation by an unhappy employer if they tell 

                                          the truth in court in a way that makes the employer look bad?

                               If “NO”, why? ________________________________________________________________

                               ___________________________________________________________________________



                                                                                                                                                                                                P2.
       YES       NO

  10   ___      ___    Do you know what “summary judgment” is?

        “Summary judgment” is a procedural device often used in civil litigation to quickly dispose of a case without a jury trial.   

    Technically, it is only supposed to be used when there is no longer any dispute (whatsoever) about the material facts of the
    case (as opposed to “trivial” facts not affecting the outcome).  The granting of summary judgment results in an automatic,
    favorable judgment to the party/-ies asking for it.

  11   ___      ___    IF perjury is shown to be likely to have occurred in court testimony, do you think the perjurous party should

                                             be automatically banned from seeking or gaining summary judgment?      

  12  ___      ___    Are you aware that the Bill of Rights – specifically the 7th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution – guarantees

                                            citizens the right to a trial by jury in civil cases involving a value of $20 or more?

    7th Amendment – “In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial 

  by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than
  according to the rules of the common law.”

  13  ___      ___    Are you aware that judges sometimes ignore the 7th Amendment and put litigants out of court based on

                                            the judges’ own decisions, without a jury trial, via “summary judgment”?

  14  ___      ___    Did you know this may even be done simply to limit the number of jury trials, regardless of the rights granted

                                            to  citizens by the U.S. Constitution itself (as shown above)?

  15  ___      ___    Do you think it possible that over-eager or corrupt judges may trample the rights of valid litigants via

                                            summary judgment?

  16  ___      ___    Could summary judgment, then, ever hurt anyone wrongly and/or significantly (- including the poor and 

                                            defenseless in society who cannot afford adequate legal representation)?

  17  ___      ___    Could dismissing one side in a lawsuit, without a trial, be a means or invitation to corruption on the part of the

                                             judges, attorneys, or wealthy litigants involved in such a lawsuit?

  18  ___      ___    Does that really matter?

  19  ___      ___    Did you know federal judges do not have to state a reason “why” they decide for or against a legal motion made

                                            by one party or the other in their courts?


                                                                                                                                                                                                P3.
       YES       NO

  20   ___      ___    Federal judges have at times simply ignored the Law, sworn testimony & other important evidence, the U.S.

                                              Constitution, & current legal precedents (– some set previously in their very own courts).
                                               - Is that okay with you?

  21  ___      ___     Do you believe other government officials have any authority to do anything about this problem?

  22  ___      ___     Are you aware that the president, vice president, all members of Congress (House & Senate) and all federal

                                               judges & Supreme Court justices…take an oath to uphold or support the U.S. Constitution when taking office?

  23  ___      ___     Is that unimportant to you, important to you, or highly important to you?  (circle choice)

  24  ___      ___     Did you know those oaths evidently have not been kept, despite the political banter by some politicians about

                                               having a pro-Constitution stance?

  25  ___      ___     Do you realize that Supreme Court justices are also obligated by oath to uphold the Law; yet, again,

                                              apparently do not do so in all cases?

  26  ___      ___     Do you realize that even when the Supreme Court knows of a situation brought to them in which some lower

                                              court/s disregarded the Law or the Constitution, they sometimes refuse to review and correct the errant
                                              ruling simply because they don’t want to bother with the case?

  27  ___      ___     When a worker makes a complaint to a labor board, they are supposed to investigate. 

                                              Did you know that the government sometimes merely contacts the employer, the employer’s legal counsel
                                              replies, and that it may all simply end there without the labor investigator asking any questions of any
                                              witnesses who work for the employer? 

                                                           (The case may then simply be closed as “inconclusive” on the sole word of the employer
                                                            leadership or their attorney, and if the complainant is poor, they may simply be “out of luck”
                                                            if they cannotafford an attorney, with district judges not being obligated to appoint them one.)


                                                                                                                                                                                                 P4.
       YES       NO

  28  ___      ___     Is that a fair trade-off, instead of a govt. investigator actually questioning the witnesses?

  29  ___      ___     (In a labor dispute), if it has been proven that someone still working for the employer has actually lied to the

                                                investigator in an effort to influence the findings, should it result in there being something like automatic
                                                penalties, a deeper investigation, etc.; or, should the government simply regard it as not worth the effort to
                                                rectify the matter even if it did unduly influence the outcome of the investigation?

  30  ___      ___     Are you aware that a popular, well-known employer has quite evidently lied to both the labor investigator and

                                             also in court affidavit testimony (each shown by documented evidence), and that no govt. official has expressed 
                                             interest (to the victim) in taking any remedial action, whatsoever, although the actual labor investigator,
                                             the state attorney general, the governor, the U.S. president, and the victim’s own state and federal House and
                                              Senate officials have been made aware of the problem?   

                                              (In fact, one U.S. Senator has lamented his inability to do anything about the
problem of
                                                            the judicial corruption, considering it a judicial problem, even though the Senate is able to
                                                            investigate and take up impeachment proceedings against corrupt judges and those who
                                                            violate their oaths of office.)
 
  31  ___      ___     Do you think govt. corruption & apathy about the illegal 
behaviors mentioned above should become a
                                              political issue this election year?

  32  ___      ___     Has this poll significantly increased your awareness of judicial corruption being a real problem confronting
                                   ordinary Americans?

  


                                                                              Thanks  for  taking  this  survey!


                                                    You may find more info. about what has been mentioned here by going
                                      to the website “Supremely UNjust”, at http://www.SupremelyUNjust.weebly.com.

 

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.