Why Does It Matter?
It's ONE worker - one of millions of employees in America; yet, he's been devastated by no fault of his own.
If it were you would you care?
The info. in Mr. Noack's Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court (main page) are reinforced in his documents to the 5th Circuit Court & (Houston's) U.S. District Court. The U.S. Supreme Court doesn't want repeats of info. Rather, it seeks to know why it should review a case. Still, the document indicates improprieties in the case. The Supreme Court refused to uphold the Law, justice, & the U.S. Constitution. THAT is of great importance and should upset people. If your basic Constitutional rights are not safe & secure, YOU - all of us - are in danger!
Big evidence was shown in lower courts, things I'd consider proof of the plaintiff's claims - surely enough to warrant a jury trial. Emails showed Noack protested (alleged) employer commands to discriminate, reasoning with his employer, and the very next email (in chronological order) indicates his supervisor stated a reason why [he was allegedly ordered to discriminate against blacks and men]. Noack showed her reason, by Law, was illegal discrimination and that the reason was likely a false one, a pretext - an attempt to avoid guilt). [See http://supremelyunjust.weebly.com/email-evidence.html , and his "reasons" in the "petition" document (http://supremelyunjust.weebly.com/index.html)]. Even aside from the reason relating to Mr. Noack, it was an apparent outright admission of (illegal) hiring practices based on race, lending credence to Noack's claims.
Justice and Noack's basic rights as a citizen were flatly denied, which correlates to a nullification of the basic rights of Americans. The courts do not have the right to dismiss the Constitution, lay aside the 7th Amendment or the Bill of Rights, nor impose rule by a few unelected judges over the lives of Americans without deference to a jury of any sort. The judges were appointed by people rich enough to gain political office - why should they alone decide you can't have what was guaranteed to you by the founding fathers & Constitution?! Too many become self-important, corrupt, & legislate from the bench. Who do they represent? If unaccountable, they represent whomever appoints them or can offer them favor. At worst, they are held accountable to nobody, and that's horrendous - they can become like haughty gods. They can do as they please, and it shows, as in this case where they obviously threw out the Law, the evidence, legal precedent and - most sacred of all - our U.S. Constitution! Wow! Yet, do Americans even care?
It's no different than in regimes of dictators where government courts make rulings as they please without regard for real justice, and to allow this kind of treatment in the USA is a perilous precedent. It is a tremendous slide backwards, for justice, - especially for the masses of common people who don't have the influence of wealth. If you & other Americans simply PERMIT this - wrongs utterly worthy of impeachment of judges & investigation by both the FBI and Congress' judicial oversight committees - then we must share via default, the guilt over the eventual consequences that may befall America, its children & its future generations.
Already, one "wild card" judge from that same U.S. District Court has been put out after his abuse of power.
(See http://babyboomeradvisorclub.com/2009/06/04/first-case-of-sexual-abuse-against-a-sitting-federal-judge-samuel-kent-galveston-texas/). Elsewhere, someone suffered more directly for opposing judicial corruption (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fXRgBqRH7f0). In still another judicial fiasco, a man aparently suffered similarly as Noack at the hands of judges simply doing as they pleased, regardless of the Law & Constitution: a Mr. Windsor seems to have gained national attention due to the rampant judicial corruption in his case that also apparently extended to the U.S. Supreme Court, and he is now leading an effort to expose judicial corruption all across America. You can find more on that at the website, Lawless America - http://lawlessamerica.com/. The wrongs done all across the U.S. might be considered worthy of a revolution if judged by the standards of the founding fathers in their days. America must oppose the corruption (- peacefully, of course).
Some judges do long for truth & hate the corruption, but they can't do it alone - they need YOUR help, or else it might not get done. If you ever have a legal problem, would YOU like going to court where things are perversely decided against you? What if you are informed you won't even be allowed a jury, because despite your great evidence, they can simply declare you guilty, put you out, and illegitimately make you the loser without any trial? Think about it, and do what's good - what's right.
Contact people who can help. Let's halt the corruption that's ruined Mr. Noack's life, and let's help preserve justice for other Americans, too. See what you can do (http://supremelyunjust.weebly.com/what-can-you-do.html).
Remember, Noack proved that perjury had been committed and likely many other improprieties, and the Law declares all must be considered in his best light as the non-movant in the summary judgment proceedings tossed against him. Judges are not allowed to decide who is lying (in place of a jury, when uncertain). Yet, court records show Mr. Noack proved the YMCA did lie (- to both the labor board & the court)! The records also show the employer admitted there was improper timekeeping and acknowledged unpaid overtime, while Noack's female coworkers all denied it had happened to them. That meant it was done to the male in the office (Noack) - evidently prejudicial treatment by the YMCA's own documents, yet all ignored!
Finally, civil cases are decided by a preponderance of the evidence, not by proven guilt (as with criminal cases). Civil law did not require Noack to utterly prove his case, EVER, and certainly not at the summary judgment stage where ALL...MUST be viewed in his best light - that's the LAW. The YMCA's entire case was based on 1/2-blanked out deposition pages & YMCA witnesses (one or more of whom had proven to give false testimony). Would YOU like being in a court where your legal opponent can basically say & do whatever & it be accepted by the judge - even if perjurous? What about if your own evidence is all ignored, and YOU get railroaded out on a judge's whim, illegally & without a jury?
Enough is enough. America, say "No!" to that judicial folly! It affects our futures.
If it were you would you care?
The info. in Mr. Noack's Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court (main page) are reinforced in his documents to the 5th Circuit Court & (Houston's) U.S. District Court. The U.S. Supreme Court doesn't want repeats of info. Rather, it seeks to know why it should review a case. Still, the document indicates improprieties in the case. The Supreme Court refused to uphold the Law, justice, & the U.S. Constitution. THAT is of great importance and should upset people. If your basic Constitutional rights are not safe & secure, YOU - all of us - are in danger!
Big evidence was shown in lower courts, things I'd consider proof of the plaintiff's claims - surely enough to warrant a jury trial. Emails showed Noack protested (alleged) employer commands to discriminate, reasoning with his employer, and the very next email (in chronological order) indicates his supervisor stated a reason why [he was allegedly ordered to discriminate against blacks and men]. Noack showed her reason, by Law, was illegal discrimination and that the reason was likely a false one, a pretext - an attempt to avoid guilt). [See http://supremelyunjust.weebly.com/email-evidence.html , and his "reasons" in the "petition" document (http://supremelyunjust.weebly.com/index.html)]. Even aside from the reason relating to Mr. Noack, it was an apparent outright admission of (illegal) hiring practices based on race, lending credence to Noack's claims.
Justice and Noack's basic rights as a citizen were flatly denied, which correlates to a nullification of the basic rights of Americans. The courts do not have the right to dismiss the Constitution, lay aside the 7th Amendment or the Bill of Rights, nor impose rule by a few unelected judges over the lives of Americans without deference to a jury of any sort. The judges were appointed by people rich enough to gain political office - why should they alone decide you can't have what was guaranteed to you by the founding fathers & Constitution?! Too many become self-important, corrupt, & legislate from the bench. Who do they represent? If unaccountable, they represent whomever appoints them or can offer them favor. At worst, they are held accountable to nobody, and that's horrendous - they can become like haughty gods. They can do as they please, and it shows, as in this case where they obviously threw out the Law, the evidence, legal precedent and - most sacred of all - our U.S. Constitution! Wow! Yet, do Americans even care?
It's no different than in regimes of dictators where government courts make rulings as they please without regard for real justice, and to allow this kind of treatment in the USA is a perilous precedent. It is a tremendous slide backwards, for justice, - especially for the masses of common people who don't have the influence of wealth. If you & other Americans simply PERMIT this - wrongs utterly worthy of impeachment of judges & investigation by both the FBI and Congress' judicial oversight committees - then we must share via default, the guilt over the eventual consequences that may befall America, its children & its future generations.
Already, one "wild card" judge from that same U.S. District Court has been put out after his abuse of power.
(See http://babyboomeradvisorclub.com/2009/06/04/first-case-of-sexual-abuse-against-a-sitting-federal-judge-samuel-kent-galveston-texas/). Elsewhere, someone suffered more directly for opposing judicial corruption (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fXRgBqRH7f0). In still another judicial fiasco, a man aparently suffered similarly as Noack at the hands of judges simply doing as they pleased, regardless of the Law & Constitution: a Mr. Windsor seems to have gained national attention due to the rampant judicial corruption in his case that also apparently extended to the U.S. Supreme Court, and he is now leading an effort to expose judicial corruption all across America. You can find more on that at the website, Lawless America - http://lawlessamerica.com/. The wrongs done all across the U.S. might be considered worthy of a revolution if judged by the standards of the founding fathers in their days. America must oppose the corruption (- peacefully, of course).
Some judges do long for truth & hate the corruption, but they can't do it alone - they need YOUR help, or else it might not get done. If you ever have a legal problem, would YOU like going to court where things are perversely decided against you? What if you are informed you won't even be allowed a jury, because despite your great evidence, they can simply declare you guilty, put you out, and illegitimately make you the loser without any trial? Think about it, and do what's good - what's right.
Contact people who can help. Let's halt the corruption that's ruined Mr. Noack's life, and let's help preserve justice for other Americans, too. See what you can do (http://supremelyunjust.weebly.com/what-can-you-do.html).
Remember, Noack proved that perjury had been committed and likely many other improprieties, and the Law declares all must be considered in his best light as the non-movant in the summary judgment proceedings tossed against him. Judges are not allowed to decide who is lying (in place of a jury, when uncertain). Yet, court records show Mr. Noack proved the YMCA did lie (- to both the labor board & the court)! The records also show the employer admitted there was improper timekeeping and acknowledged unpaid overtime, while Noack's female coworkers all denied it had happened to them. That meant it was done to the male in the office (Noack) - evidently prejudicial treatment by the YMCA's own documents, yet all ignored!
Finally, civil cases are decided by a preponderance of the evidence, not by proven guilt (as with criminal cases). Civil law did not require Noack to utterly prove his case, EVER, and certainly not at the summary judgment stage where ALL...MUST be viewed in his best light - that's the LAW. The YMCA's entire case was based on 1/2-blanked out deposition pages & YMCA witnesses (one or more of whom had proven to give false testimony). Would YOU like being in a court where your legal opponent can basically say & do whatever & it be accepted by the judge - even if perjurous? What about if your own evidence is all ignored, and YOU get railroaded out on a judge's whim, illegally & without a jury?
Enough is enough. America, say "No!" to that judicial folly! It affects our futures.